Citation
Vipriyanti Nyoman Utari, . and Iswaratantra Gede Widya, . and Maba Wayan, . and Surata Sang Putu Kaler, . The economic social and ecological potential of Gerokgak reservoir as a new tourism destination in North Bali. pp. 182-189. ISSN 2672-7226
Abstract
The development of Gerokgak reservoir as a tourism destination in Buleleng regency requires a wise strategy. Besides having great potential Gerokgak reservoir has a strategic role to play for the community. Efforts to develop Gerokgak reservoir as a tourism destination must be done carefully to minimise the negative impacts that may be caused. This study aims to analyse Gerokgak reservoirs potential as a tourism destination especially through the economic social and ecological aspects using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) method. Based on the analysis it was found that the EO (Economic and Operational Implementation aspects) reached a value of 31.11 followed by the BE (Biological and Ecological aspects) with 22.16 so both are at the same unit level (C) of changes/very positive impacts. However the SC (Sociological and Cultural aspects) only shows a value of 8.65 with a range of units (A ) showing changes/slight positive impact. Therefore the development process must optimise the implementation of EO without disrupting the existence of BE. Whereas the SC development can be deferred in advance because the impact and benefits that may occur are not as large and as significant as the other two aspects.
Download File
Full text available from:
Official URL: https://jssm.umt.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/sites/5...
|
Abstract
The development of Gerokgak reservoir as a tourism destination in Buleleng regency requires a wise strategy. Besides having great potential Gerokgak reservoir has a strategic role to play for the community. Efforts to develop Gerokgak reservoir as a tourism destination must be done carefully to minimise the negative impacts that may be caused. This study aims to analyse Gerokgak reservoirs potential as a tourism destination especially through the economic social and ecological aspects using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) method. Based on the analysis it was found that the EO (Economic and Operational Implementation aspects) reached a value of 31.11 followed by the BE (Biological and Ecological aspects) with 22.16 so both are at the same unit level (C) of changes/very positive impacts. However the SC (Sociological and Cultural aspects) only shows a value of 8.65 with a range of units (A ) showing changes/slight positive impact. Therefore the development process must optimise the implementation of EO without disrupting the existence of BE. Whereas the SC development can be deferred in advance because the impact and benefits that may occur are not as large and as significant as the other two aspects.
Additional Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
AGROVOC Term: | Economics |
AGROVOC Term: | Social aspects |
AGROVOC Term: | Ecological factors |
AGROVOC Term: | Reservoirs |
AGROVOC Term: | Tourism |
AGROVOC Term: | Resource management |
AGROVOC Term: | Economic analysis |
AGROVOC Term: | analysis |
AGROVOC Term: | Environmental impact |
AGROVOC Term: | Community development |
Depositing User: | Mr. AFANDI ABDUL MALEK |
Last Modified: | 24 Apr 2025 00:55 |
URI: | http://webagris.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/10332 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |