Physical changes to oil palm empty fruit bunches EFB and EFB mat ECOMAT during their decompostion in the field

Teh C. B. S., . and Goh K. J., . and Kamarudin K. N., . (2009) Physical changes to oil palm empty fruit bunches EFB and EFB mat ECOMAT during their decompostion in the field. [Proceedings Paper]

The main objective of this study was to determine the physical changes to oil palm empty fruit bunches EFB and EFB mat Ecomat used as soil mulching materials during their decomposition in the field. The field experiment was conducted at an estate with nine-year-old oil palm trees and with a hill slope of 6. The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block with two treatments EFB and Ecomat and three replications. For each replication EFB was applied as a single layer on the soil surface at a rate of 1000 kg palm-1. Ecomat was applied as a single layer of four carpet pieces arranged side-by-side and without gaps between the pieces. Each piece of Ecomat carpet had an area of 1 m and an average thickness of 20 mm. Data was collected every two months interval for six months. Physical properties of EFB and Ecomat measured were bulk density water content water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Additionally soil water content up to 750 mm depth was measured daily. The mean thickness of EFB and Ecomat at the start of the experiment were about 120 and 20 mm respectively. For EFB its thickness reduced at a rate of 15.0 mm month- whereas for Ecomat at a slower rate of 2.4 mm month-. It was estimated using linear regression equations that both EFB and Ecomat would fully decompose in slightly over 9 months. Results also showed that as compared to Ecomat EFB had a lower bulk density higher saturated hydraulic conductivity and higher water content. EFB also held its water more strongly than Ecomat. All these properties helped the soil treated with EFB to have more water than the soil treated with Ecomat. Ecomat was on average two times more compact than EFB 0.24 Mg m- for Ecomat against 0.11 Mg m-for EFB. Bulk density for both materials however would not significantly change over time. Nevertheless saturated hydraulic conductivity K for EFB was on average two times higher than for Ecomat and the K for both mulching materials would decrease by over two times over time. EFB also contained more water by 26.6 and held the water more strongly than Ecomat. Lastly the soil under EFB mulch had on average 16 more water than the soil under Ecomat mulch.

Full text available from:

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine the physical changes to oil palm empty fruit bunches EFB and EFB mat Ecomat used as soil mulching materials during their decomposition in the field. The field experiment was conducted at an estate with nine-year-old oil palm trees and with a hill slope of 6. The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block with two treatments EFB and Ecomat and three replications. For each replication EFB was applied as a single layer on the soil surface at a rate of 1000 kg palm-1. Ecomat was applied as a single layer of four carpet pieces arranged side-by-side and without gaps between the pieces. Each piece of Ecomat carpet had an area of 1 m and an average thickness of 20 mm. Data was collected every two months interval for six months. Physical properties of EFB and Ecomat measured were bulk density water content water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Additionally soil water content up to 750 mm depth was measured daily. The mean thickness of EFB and Ecomat at the start of the experiment were about 120 and 20 mm respectively. For EFB its thickness reduced at a rate of 15.0 mm month- whereas for Ecomat at a slower rate of 2.4 mm month-. It was estimated using linear regression equations that both EFB and Ecomat would fully decompose in slightly over 9 months. Results also showed that as compared to Ecomat EFB had a lower bulk density higher saturated hydraulic conductivity and higher water content. EFB also held its water more strongly than Ecomat. All these properties helped the soil treated with EFB to have more water than the soil treated with Ecomat. Ecomat was on average two times more compact than EFB 0.24 Mg m- for Ecomat against 0.11 Mg m-for EFB. Bulk density for both materials however would not significantly change over time. Nevertheless saturated hydraulic conductivity K for EFB was on average two times higher than for Ecomat and the K for both mulching materials would decrease by over two times over time. EFB also contained more water by 26.6 and held the water more strongly than Ecomat. Lastly the soil under EFB mulch had on average 16 more water than the soil under Ecomat mulch.

[error in script]

Item Type:	Proceedings Paper
Additional Information:	Available at Perpustakaan Sultan Abdul Samad Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 UPM Serdang Selangor Malaysia. S590.2 S683 2009 Call Number.
AGROVOC Term:	Oil palm
AGROVOC Term:	Decomposition
AGROVOC Term:	Hydraulic conductivity
AGROVOC Term:	Soil water content
AGROVOC Term:	Soil chemicophysical properties
AGROVOC Term:	Experimental design
AGROVOC Term:	Field experiments
AGROVOC Term:	Sampling
AGROVOC Term:	Analysis of variance
AGROVOC Term:	Mulching materials
Geographical Term:	MALAYSIA
Depositing User:	Ms. Suzila Mohamad Kasim
Last Modified:	24 Apr 2025 05:16
URI:	http://webagris.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13504

Actions (login required)

View Item