Analysis of the uncertainties of the inclusion of indirect land use change into the European Union renewable energy sources directive II

Loh Soh Kheang, . and Ainie Kuntom, . and Astimar Abdul Aziz, . and Vijaya Subramaniam, . and Haryati Zainal, . and Ghulam Kadir Ahmad Parveez, . Analysis of the uncertainties of the inclusion of indirect land use change into the European Union renewable energy sources directive II. pp. 480-488. ISSN 1511-2780

Indirect land use change (ILUC) occurs when vegetable oils which were previously used for food are now also used as fuels which compels more land to be cleared to fulfil this additional demand. This article analyses the uncertainties and biasness of the inclusion of ILUC into the European Union Renewable Energy Sources Directive (EU RED) II especially towards palm oil. The consideration of a feedstock globally instead of regions penalises sustainable producers of a feedstock. Loading a detrimental projected deforestation percentage on palm oil based on limited publication with high uncertainties is not acceptable. Disregarding the increasing forest cover in Malaysia now at 55.6 due to Malaysian government pledge and intervention to maintain at least 50 of the country as forest cover seems unfair. Projections were based on historical data which contradicts developments and improvements which never follows historical data or events. In terms of oil yield palm oil is 5.56 10.53 and 7.84 times more productive than rapeseed soyabean and sunflower oil respectively. To substitute one million tonnes of palm oil which can be produced in 250 000 ha yr-1 will require soyabean rapeseed and sunflower oil 2 632 500 1 390 000 and 1 960 000 ha yr-1 respectively which will increase the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the land use change and ILUC for these crops as well. National sustainability certifications need to be supported by EU to fill the gap and to be recognised to certify the low ILUC risk and additionality. Generally many components of the Commission Delegated Regulation are very restrictive to palm oil and are presented without clear scientific evidence which appears to be targeted at disqualifying the use of palm oil as biofuel. This can be construed as a form of trade protectionism and more politically driven rather than science.

Full text available from: Official URL: http://jopr.mpob.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/09...

Abstract

Indirect land use change (ILUC) occurs when vegetable oils which were previously used for food are now also used as fuels which compels more land to be cleared to fulfil this additional demand. This article analyses the uncertainties and biasness of the inclusion of ILUC into the European Union Renewable Energy Sources Directive (EU RED) II especially towards palm oil. The consideration of a feedstock globally instead of regions penalises sustainable producers of a feedstock. Loading a detrimental projected deforestation percentage on palm oil based on limited publication with high uncertainties is not acceptable. Disregarding the increasing forest cover in Malaysia now at 55.6 due to Malaysian government pledge and intervention to maintain at least 50 of the country as forest cover seems unfair. Projections were based on historical data which contradicts developments and improvements which never follows historical data or events. In terms of oil yield palm oil is 5.56 10.53 and 7.84 times more productive than rapeseed soyabean and sunflower oil respectively. To substitute one million tonnes of palm oil which can be produced in 250 000 ha yr-1 will require soyabean rapeseed and sunflower oil 2 632 500 1 390 000 and 1 960 000 ha yr-1 respectively which will increase the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the land use change and ILUC for these crops as well. National sustainability certifications need to be supported by EU to fill the gap and to be recognised to certify the low ILUC risk and additionality. Generally many components of the Commission Delegated Regulation are very restrictive to palm oil and are presented without clear scientific evidence which appears to be targeted at disqualifying the use of palm oil as biofuel. This can be construed as a form of trade protectionism and more politically driven rather than science.

[error in script]

Item Type:	Article
AGROVOC Term:	Palm oils
AGROVOC Term:	Oil crops
AGROVOC Term:	Land use
AGROVOC Term:	Bioenergy
AGROVOC Term:	Renewable energy
AGROVOC Term:	Agricultural land
AGROVOC Term:	Deforestation
AGROVOC Term:	Certification
AGROVOC Term:	Stakeholder
AGROVOC Term:	Yields
Depositing User:	Mr. AFANDI ABDUL MALEK
Last Modified:	24 Apr 2025 00:54
URI:	http://webagris.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/8684

Actions (login required)

View Item