Citation
Shackleton C . M ., . and Shackleton S . E ., . Direct use values of secondary resources harvested from communal savannas in the Bushbuckridge lowveld South Africa. pp. 28-47. ISSN 1394-2204
Abstract
This study reports on the direct use value of secondary resources harvested by rural communities in savanna region of South Africa. Data pertaining to the use amount and direct use value of 11 secondary resources were presented individually along with a final composite value. Only five resources (fuelwood construction wood edible fruits edible herb medicinal plants) individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total value per hectare (USD 141) and together they represented over 94 percent of the total value per hectare. On a per household basis only 3 of the 11 resources contributed 10 percent or more to the total direct use value (USD 386 used at home and USD 767 traded) and together contributed greater than 71 percent of the total direct use value per household. Two-thirds of the value per household was traded locally with other households or regionally rather than consumed at home. The total value per hectare compared favourably with other land uses within the region except for capital intensive enterprises. The returns to collecting and selling secondary resources were higher than those paid for local agricultural wage labour. The extraction rates of several of the secondary resources are probably sustainable but not for the more important ones such as fuelwood construction wood and medicinal plants.
Download File
Full text available from:
|
Abstract
This study reports on the direct use value of secondary resources harvested by rural communities in savanna region of South Africa. Data pertaining to the use amount and direct use value of 11 secondary resources were presented individually along with a final composite value. Only five resources (fuelwood construction wood edible fruits edible herb medicinal plants) individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total value per hectare (USD 141) and together they represented over 94 percent of the total value per hectare. On a per household basis only 3 of the 11 resources contributed 10 percent or more to the total direct use value (USD 386 used at home and USD 767 traded) and together contributed greater than 71 percent of the total direct use value per household. Two-thirds of the value per household was traded locally with other households or regionally rather than consumed at home. The total value per hectare compared favourably with other land uses within the region except for capital intensive enterprises. The returns to collecting and selling secondary resources were higher than those paid for local agricultural wage labour. The extraction rates of several of the secondary resources are probably sustainable but not for the more important ones such as fuelwood construction wood and medicinal plants.
Additional Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Summaries (En Ms) |
AGROVOC Term: | FOREST RESOURCES |
AGROVOC Term: | ANIMAL RESOURCES |
AGROVOC Term: | FOOD RESOURCES |
AGROVOC Term: | PLANT RESOURCES |
AGROVOC Term: | HARVESTING |
AGROVOC Term: | USE VALUE |
AGROVOC Term: | SAVANNAS |
AGROVOC Term: | SOUTH AFRICA RECURSOS FORESTALES |
AGROVOC Term: | RECURSOS DE LA FAUNA |
AGROVOC Term: | RECURSOS ALIMENTARIOS |
Depositing User: | Ms. Norfaezah Khomsan |
Last Modified: | 24 Apr 2025 05:52 |
URI: | http://webagris.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/17891 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |